Genetically-modified organisms lower the cost of producing food, likely saving tens of millions of people from starvation in underdeveloped countries. Despite this, many liberals in wealthy countries detest genetically-modified food even if it has been cleared by federal agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration. The Left doesn’t have the votes in Congress to get an outright ban, so instead they have been pursuing frivolous lawsuits against farmers. Until now, it had been an effective tactic. But earlier this week, President Barack Obama signed a government funding bill that contained a provision which will allow farmers to continue to grow federally-approved genetically-modified crops while legal appeals are ongoing. From now on, the mere filing of a lawsuit won’t shut down production.
Naturally, the Left is furious. Apparently, they would rather Obama veto a government-funding bill than allow farmers continue to produce FDA-approved, genetically-modified food.
— Rachael (@maryploppins613) March 31, 2013
— Kendra Jo (@thenewKendra) March 31, 2013
— m to the izzo (@paxbinky) March 31, 2013
— MΣAUX GRΣΣN (@themeauxgreen) March 31, 2013
— Dave Cohen (@AxlRosenberg) March 31, 2013
— Brian (@BrdalBrian) March 31, 2013
The current firestorm follows months of anti-GMO propagandizing by celebrities:
— danny masterson (@dannymasterson) May 3, 2012
Stop Monsanto from getting federal law immunity that’d allow the biotech industry to plant genetically modified crops: bit.ly/QPr2cc
— Rosario Dawson (@rosariodawson) December 12, 2012
Say NO to GMO!!Why are we eating genetically modified food?Why are the bees vanishing?You have a right to know..!CA VOTE YES ON PROP 37!
— Charlie Sheen (@charliesheen) November 5, 2012
— Alicia Silverstone (@AliciaSilv) March 15, 2013
Consumers who want to avoid genetically-modified foods can still do so. Shouldn’t those of us who want to consume FDA-approved genetically-modified food be able to do so as well? Or is “choice” important only when it pertains to reproductive rights?